Number of air tankers increases for the first time since 2007

Conair RJ85 first flight
The first flight of Conair’s BAe Avro RJ85 in September, 2013, built for Aero-Flite. Conair photo by Jeff Bough.

The large air tanker fleet in the United States is on track to have more than double the number that were flying at the beginning of the summer in 2013. Last year there were nine large air tankers available near the beginning of the western fire season, and by mid-July this year there are expected to be 20 on contract that are fully certified, flyable, and ready to assist firefighters on the ground. Air tanker UTF In 2002 there were 44 large air tankers on exclusive use contracts, but that number as been generally in a downward spiral since then until it reached the low point of nine in 2013. Thanks to the the U.S. Forest Service adding three additional jet-powered BAe-146s to the “legacy contract” temporarily this year, and with nine other air tankers being on five-year or temporary one-year “next generation” contracts, we expect the air tanker fleet to be the largest since 2009.

Large air tankers-2014

Five of the 20 air tankers are on temporary one-year contracts added under the “additional equipment” provisions of the contracts that Neptune and 10 Tanker Air Carrier have for their BAe-146s and DC-10s. Unless the USFS decides again next year to award them another one-year contract (if they have the funds to do so) those five may disappear and the total number could decrease to 15.

Within the next week or so 16 large air tankers should be fully activated and on duty. There are still four that have contracts but are still going through the final stages of conversion, live drop tests, or approval of a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) by the Federal Aviation Administration.

In addition to the 20 large air tankers, there will be 33 single engine air tankers (SEATs) on exclusive use national contracts.

10 Tanker Air Carrier is converting their third DC-10. It has all of the necessary approvals and is expected to be ready to fight fire in July.

Aero-Flite has the approval of the Interagency AirTanker Board and is waiting on the STC before their two RJ85s can begin work. They hope to have everything all squared away by mid- to late June.

Minden has been working on their BAe-146 for several years and has scheduled their airborne drop tests, the “grid test”, to begin the week of June 16. They are waiting for the FAA to issue their STC. The FAA representative who was working on it had to leave the country on an assignment, slowing down the process.

By mid-summer there will be three additional air tankers that that the U.S. Forest service could activate on one-year additional equipment contracts. Neptune, Erickson Aero Tanker, and Aero-Flite will each have one additional approved air tanker sitting on their ramps.

The U.S. Forest Service could have, with the stroke of a pen, a total of 23 large air tankers flying this summer. The states in the far west are expected to have an above normal wildfire potential this summer. If that turns out to be accurate and houses are burning and residents are being killed, some questions will be asked if those three recently converted next generation air tankers are still cooling their wheels on an airport ramp because a bureaucrat in the Department of Agriculture decided to look the other way.

Tanker 41
Tanker 41, a BAe-146, flyover May 21, 2014 at the University of Montana during the Large Fire Conference at Missoula. Photo by Bill Gabbert.

Typos, let us know HERE. And, please keep in mind our commenting ground rules before you post a comment.

2 thoughts on “Number of air tankers increases for the first time since 2007”

  1. When you look at the numbers shown of current Large Air Tankers, it’s pretty impressive. The differences in aircraft types and delivery systems on all the new tankers is American ingenuity at it’s best. The jet era has taken over the Air Tanker industry.

    Here’s a few questions; With the current number of tankers for 2014 @ 20, how will the 7 USFS C-130’s fit in? Given that they are at the earliest 2 years from being operational with at least one or two aircraft. This also raises the question of the additional tankers that the current companies are working on or additional aircraft they might be adding to their current fleets:

    Neptune – going from the current 4 – 146’s to 10 with a one for one trader when they retire their P2Vs in coming years.
    Miden – will probably add a 146 with they retire their P2V.
    AeroFlite – has 3 RJ 85’s and will probably add another in a few years.
    Tanker 10 – WOW 3 – DC10’s and I’m sure they have another airframe for the fourth!
    Erikson Tankers – 3 operational MD87’s with at least 4 more in the making.
    Coulson – has 1 C130 and for sure will have another very soon.

    So, there could be 25 to 30 large tankers available in 2016, not counting the 7 USFS C130’s which would start coming on line if the program works. Once fully operational with 7 aircraft who flies against fires first – civilian company air tankers or the USFA? Also does the USFS C-130 program cancel the use of the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve C-130’s? Or, would they remain on emergency call only as needed when ALL civilian air tanker companies are all working?

    When added up there could be over 40 large air tankers available by 2017. Making it possible to hit fires hard with a lot of air support and not let the fires get out of control, YEA, I know, mother nature changes that!

  2. Not much commentary on this

    But I would imagine that there are somewhat enough of a diversity of airtankers and that the GAO report on the sole source contract that went awry may have had a factor in the ” all of a sudden increases” in airframe diversity.

    Impressive? Don’t know….

    These airframes were out there. Some just needing a simple contract process to get airborne……others in various stages of FAA STC compliance.

    Increases like this just do not occur unless there were pressures during the last seeing the fiasco and having all that political horsepower at DC and maybe even the States and NASF having a little say in this.

    Just pure speculation and just enough pessimism read here not to get all giidddy like over more than double the number of aircraft .

Comments are closed.