NTSB releases report on helicopter that crashed during aerial ignition operations on prescribed fire

There was one fatality and two serious injuries in the 2019 crash in Texas

Updated February 23, 2022

The Final Report released by the NTSB concluded that the loss of engine power on the helicopter that crashed while working on a prescribed fire in Texas, March 27, 2019 was due to a loose fuel line.

Maintenance personnel’s failure to properly re-install and secure a fuel line, which resulted in a total loss of engine power.

One person was killed and another had serious injuries.

 


Originally published January 19, 2022

Texas March 27, 2019 helicopter crash aerial ignitions
The March 27, 2019 helicopter crash in Texas. Photo by Sgt. Erik Burse/Texas Department of Public Safety.

The National Transportation Safety Board has released their factual report on the crash of an AS350 helicopter that occurred March 27, 2019 during operations on a prescribed fire in Texas. Three people were on board, a pilot and two firefighters. The surviving firefighter and pilot were able to exit the helicopter; however, the second firefighter was partially ejected and sustained fatal injuries. The pilot suffered serious injuries and the surviving firefighter’s injuries were minor. The two injured personnel were transported to a hospital in stable condition after rescuers extracted them from the wreckage using jaws and air bags.

Daniel_J_Laird
Daniel J. Laird. Tahoe National Forest photo.

The firefighter killed was Daniel Laird, a Captain on the Tahoe Helitack crew in California. He left behind a wife and young daughter.

Mr. Laird was a U.S. Forest Service employee who, along with the other firefighter and the pilot, were on an aerial ignition mission. Their equipment was dropping plastic spheres that burst into flame after hitting the ground, helping to ignite the prescribed fire. The ship came to rest outside the active area of the prescribed fire and there was no additional fire caused by the crash.

The pilot and surviving crew member reported that after completing the application of plastic spheres they began flying back to the staging area when the engine lost total power.

Most NTSB accident reports are fairly straightforward, but this report, due to the way it is written, still leaves a small amount of doubt about the cause of the engine failure. However, signs point toward a loose fuel line.

“The fuel line between the firewall and hydro-mechanical unit (HMU) was loose and the required safety wire was not installed,” it says, and no other discrepancies were found. It does not say if the fuel line was loose enough to cause the engine to lose power.

From the NTSB report:

Federal Aviation Administration inspectors from the Houston Flight Standards District Office interviewed Mountain Air’s Director of Maintenance, who stated that on February 14, 2019, the USFS requested to validate the helicopter’s weight and balance. The helicopter was defueled, which involved disconnecting the main fuel line. After the weight and balance were verified, the main fuel line was reconnected. The director of maintenance asked another mechanic to verify that the fuel lines were reconnected, which was reportedly accomplished. The mechanic that accomplished the work informed the operator that he “was confident” that he torqued and secured the line. There was no other maintenance work which involved opening the fuel line after that day. On February 23, 2019, the helicopter’s engine would not light, and the engine’s igniters and/or igniter box was replaced. A maintenance records review found that the helicopter flew about 24.9 hours after the weight and balance was conducted on February 14, 2019.

On March 25, 2019, the pilot reported to management that the fuel pressure light had “flickered” during a flight “a few days before;” the pilot turned on the fuel boost pump, turned it off, and the light never reappeared. The pilot was informed to monitor the situation and report if it occurred again.

Following the accident, the digital engine control unit (DECU) was removed and sent to the manufacturer for data download. On April 11, 2019, the DECU was downloaded under the auspices of the FAA. The last recorded fault was a “P3 drift or engine flame out.”

The helicopter, N818MC, was owned Mountain Air Helicopters, Inc.  The company has five other helicopters and a Cessna 414A registered with the FAA.

In 2015 two were killed in Mississippi under similar circumstances on a prescribed fire when engine failure brought down a helicopter conducting aerial ignition operations. A third person suffered serious injuries.

march 30, 2015 helicopter crash Mississippi aerial ignitions
The helicopter involved in the March 30, 2015 incident in Mississippi, N50KH, is shown with doors removed and Pilot and PSD operator positions visible.

Our take

Flying low and slow in a single-engine helicopter while igniting fire below the aircraft is obviously very, very dangerous. These three fatalities offer very compelling justification for using drones for aerial ignition instead of manned aircraft.

Thanks and a tip of the hat go out to Sean.

Typos, let us know, and please keep in mind the commenting ground rules before you post a comment.

7 thoughts on “NTSB releases report on helicopter that crashed during aerial ignition operations on prescribed fire”

  1. Helicopter PSD work is going to go the way of the dodo bird. It can’t happen to soon IMO.

    Drones are cheap, are holding more and more balls (DOIs purchased Ignis 2.0 will hold 400), geofencing, mission planning via an app, use it for holding after firing, etc.

    Even if they can’t go head to head with a helicopter PSD op currently, they either will or it will be so cheap and low risk to operate them you can justify flying multiple on one RX.

  2. Thanks for posting the report. I concur with your assessment. If ever there were a case for drones, it is low level burn ops.
    Not that it will bring him back but I hope Mr. Lairds family files a large lawsuit if indeed it was a fuel line issue. Sad situation. My heart still goes out to them.

    1. Condolences to all in the operation.

      NOW its time to put a drone up against a Bell 206 w a PSD at same altitude and near same speeds and match acre for acre, species for species…..how many thousand balls can be delivered by and cover more acres than maybe 20-100 balls per drone and how many re fills and returns by drone vs same in a 206/ AS350 w PSD type op?

        1. Thats what it will take…multiple drones with multiple geo-fenced areas…thats ok …I get it…..cheaper, safer, uses less fuel, etc….drones and UAS are going to be the go to answer.

          40 yrs from now the helicopter and PSD will re introduced as a “new idea” cuz we need to cover more acres.

          While UAS is a good idea….it won’t fit every mission and like the say about helicopters and airtankers……” just another tool in the toolbox.” Shheeessh…that’s another worn out moniker….

Comments are closed.